### The Top Ten Worst Movie Remakes: A Countdown from Bad to the Worst
Remakes can be a tricky endeavor. When Hollywood decides to reboot a classic, audiences brace themselves, hoping for the best but fearing the worst. Some remakes honor their original films, while others crash and burn, leaving fans wondering why they were ever greenlit. This list dives into the ten worst movie remakes, counting down from “not quite the worst” at number ten to the remake that’s widely considered the absolute lowest at number one. Our sources range from Reddit, Quora, IMDB, YouTube, and other online discussions, showcasing the collective frustration of film fans worldwide.
---
### **10. *The Mummy* (2017)**
When Universal rebooted *The Mummy* as part of a planned "Dark Universe," fans expected a thrilling horror revival. Instead, they got a messy, action-heavy film with Tom Cruise at the helm, leaving horror fans disappointed. While the original Brendan Fraser films were lighthearted and fun, the 2017 remake fell flat, attempting to be both horror and action without capturing the spirit of either. Fans on IMDB and Reddit argue that its biggest sin was losing the charm of its predecessors.
> *“It’s trying to do so much at once that it ends up doing nothing well. Bring back Brendan Fraser!”* – Reddit User
---
### **9. *RoboCop* (2014)**
The 2014 remake of *RoboCop* was an attempt to update the violent, satirical 1987 classic with a polished, modern aesthetic. However, fans argue that it stripped away the grit and dark humor that made the original so iconic. A thread on Quora criticizes the remake for being too “clean” and “PG,” missing out on the gritty satire that made the original special.
> *“They took a satirical, brutal movie and turned it into a generic action flick. It’s RoboCop without the bite.”* – Quora User
---
### **8. *Total Recall* (2012)**
The 1990 *Total Recall* starring Arnold Schwarzenegger is beloved for its bizarre storyline and unforgettable one-liners. But the 2012 remake, starring Colin Farrell, failed to capture the spirit of the original, opting for a more straightforward sci-fi approach and removing the Martian setting. Fans on YouTube point out that the film felt soulless, and it didn’t bring anything new to the table.
> *“The original had heart and camp. This one just had…more CGI. Pointless remake.”* – YouTube Commenter
---
### **7. *Psycho* (1998)**
Gus Van Sant’s 1998 shot-for-shot remake of *Psycho* is often cited as one of the strangest choices in film history. The remake featured Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates but recreated Alfred Hitchcock's masterpiece nearly identically, leaving fans bewildered. Many on Reddit argue that the remake adds nothing of value, making it redundant at best and sacrilegious at worst.
> *“If you’re going to remake a masterpiece, at least add something new. This one was just…why?”* – IMDB User
---
### **6. *Point Break* (2015)**
The original *Point Break* (1991), starring Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze, was a high-octane action thriller with a unique surf-meets-crime plot. The 2015 remake, however, swapped surfing for extreme sports, removing much of the charm. On Tumblr, fans complain that the remake tried too hard to be edgy, ultimately missing the heart and intensity of the original.
> *“They replaced all the character and fun with extreme sports stunts. Point Break was so much more than that.”* – Tumblr Post
---
### **5. *Arthur* (2011)**
The 1981 *Arthur* starring Dudley Moore is a charming classic, balancing humor with a touch of melancholy. The 2011 remake, however, cast Russell Brand as the titular character, and fans feel it missed the mark. Quora users argue that Brand’s portrayal lacked the wit and depth of Moore's, turning Arthur into a caricature rather than a complex, lovable character.
> *“Russell Brand’s Arthur just felt annoying rather than endearing. It missed the nuance that made the original special.”* – Quora User
---
### **4. *The Wicker Man* (2006)**
Nicholas Cage’s 2006 remake of *The Wicker Man* has gained a reputation as one of the most unintentionally hilarious horror films ever made. The original 1973 *Wicker Man* is a suspenseful, haunting tale, but Cage’s version spirals into absurdity with over-the-top acting and baffling scenes. Many on IMDB call it “so bad it’s good,” but it’s still widely considered a poorly executed remake.
> *“Not the bees! It’s an iconic line now, but for all the wrong reasons. This movie is a mess.”* – IMDB Reviewer
---
### **3. *Red Dawn* (2012)**
The 1984 *Red Dawn* captured Cold War-era paranoia with a story of American teenagers defending against a Soviet invasion. The 2012 remake substituted North Korea as the antagonist, a decision that many Reddit users argue felt unrealistic and forced. The remake attempted to modernize the plot but came off as hollow and lacking the original’s tension.
> *“It’s just a weak, forgettable remake. The original had an edge, this one is just trying too hard.”* – Reddit User
---
### **2. *The Fog* (2005)**
John Carpenter’s *The Fog* (1980) is a cult classic with a spooky atmosphere and eerie tension. The 2005 remake, however, failed to recapture the magic, opting for CGI over practical effects and delivering uninspired scares. YouTube comments note that the characters lack depth, and the remake feels like a generic ghost story rather than a suspenseful horror film.
> *“They took all the creepiness out and replaced it with bad CGI. The original is miles better.”* – YouTube Commenter
---
### **1. *Ben-Hur* (2016)**
Taking the number one spot as the worst remake is the 2016 *Ben-Hur*, an attempt to update the 1959 classic that won 11 Oscars. Fans on Reddit and IMDB were baffled by the decision to remake such a highly regarded film, especially in a way that felt lackluster and unnecessary. The remake’s CGI-heavy chariot scenes and uninspired storytelling failed to capture the grandeur and emotion of the original.
> *“It’s like remaking the Mona Lisa with crayons. Some things are better left alone.”* – IMDB User
---
### Conclusion
From the bewildering shot-for-shot remake of *Psycho* to the uninspired, CGI-laden *Ben-Hur*, these remakes demonstrate that sometimes, classic films are best left untouched. Although some remakes manage to honor and even improve upon their originals, these ten fell flat, failing to capture the essence, charm, or impact of the originals. Fans from Reddit, Quora, and across the internet have spoken, making it clear that not all movies benefit from a modern reboot.
Comments